Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne


I am not a leading authority on any one discipline that I write about and teach, it is my hope and wish that with all the subjects I have studied it provides me an advantage point that I offer in as clear and cohesive writings as possible in introducing the matters in my materials. I hope to serve as one who inspires direction in the practitioner so they can go on to discover greater teachers and professionals that will build on this fundamental foundation. Find the authorities and synthesize a wholehearted and holistic concept, perception and belief that will not drive your practices but rather inspire them to evolve, grow and prosper. My efforts are born of those who are more experienced and knowledgable than I. I hope you find that path! See the bibliography I provide for an initial list of experts, professionals and masters of the subjects.

The Wandering Flame

A Parable of Bodhidharma


Walls hold no wisdom—

a gaze burns through stone and time,

mind meets its own face.

 

One sandal left behind—

the ferryman asks no price

from those who let go.

 

by CEJames (researcher/author) & Akira Ichinose (editor/research assistant)

 

CAVEAT (Keikoku [警告])

The content presented here is for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a certified self-defense methodology. Laws governing the use of force vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult a qualified attorney and seek instruction from a certified self-defense professional before making any decisions regarding personal protection.

 

Prologue: A Flame That Would Not Stay

There is a story — old enough that the edges have gone soft, the way stones go smooth in a river — about a man who carried fire across the sea. His name was Bodhidharma, and what makes him interesting is not that he was a saint. What makes him interesting is that he was a problem. He disrupted everything he touched, then walked away, and the disruption outlasted him by fifteen hundred years.


Let's tell it plainly, the way a good story deserves to be told.


Part One: The Prince Who Chose the Hard Road

Sometime around the late fifth century CE — scholars argue the exact dates, and we'll let them — a young man of noble or even royal birth in the Pallava region of southern India turned his back on everything comfortable. His name, before the titles accumulated, was likely Bodhitara. His father, by some accounts, was a king (Broughton, 1999). That alone should tell you something: this is not a story about someone who had nothing to lose.


He took vows under the great master Prajnatara, and it was Prajnatara, according to tradition, who gave him the name Bodhidharma — 'the Awakening of Dharma' — and charged him with a mission that would have made most reasonable people pause: go to China, the vast, ancient, already-sophisticated civilization to the north, and plant the seeds of a deeper understanding of the Buddha's mind (Dumoulin, 2005).


Bodhidharma was not, by most accounts, a comfortable man to be around. He was blunt in the way that only very clear thinkers tend to be. He didn't soften things. If you came to him looking for validation, you left with something more useful and considerably more uncomfortable.


Part Two: The Emperor and the Empty Answer

The parable sharpens into focus when Bodhidharma arrives in China — likely early in the sixth century CE — and is granted an audience with Emperor Wu of the Liang dynasty (reigned 502–549 CE). Emperor Wu was no spiritual lightweight. He had sponsored the copying of Buddhist sutras, built temples, fed monks, and funded monasteries on a scale that would humble lesser rulers. He was, by any external measure, a great patron of the Dharma (Ferguson, 2011).


So when Bodhidharma stood before him, the Emperor understandably expected praise. He asked, with the quiet pride of a man who already knows the answer: 


'What merit have I accumulated through all these good works?'


Bodhidharma looked at him.

'None whatsoever,' he said.


The Emperor, understandably rattled, pressed further: 'What is the highest truth of the holy teachings?'


'Vast emptiness,' said Bodhidharma. 'Nothing holy.'


'Who,' asked the Emperor — and you can hear the irritation now — 'is this standing before me?'


'I don't know,' said Bodhidharma (Cleary & Cleary, 1977).


And that was that. Bodhidharma left the Emperor's court. Crossed the Yangtze River — tradition says he did so standing on a reed, which is the kind of detail a good story collects along the way — and headed north, into the mountains of Henan Province. He found a cave near the Shaolin Monastery on Song Mountain and sat down facing the wall.


He sat there for nine years.


Part Three: The Wall and What It Taught

Nine years facing a stone wall. The story has attracted skeptics, of course — nine years is a long time, and some scholars regard the wall-gazing legend as hagiographic embellishment (McRae, 2003). But here's the thing about legendary details: even when they can't be verified, they point at something true.


What Bodhidharma was doing, whether you take the nine years literally or not, was demonstrating something that no sermon could have communicated. He was sitting with himself, completely, with nothing to hide behind. No ritual, no merit-counting, no performance. The wall doesn't flatter you. It doesn't confirm what you want to be true. It just reflects your own mind back at you, undisguised.


This was the essence of what would become Chan Buddhism — and, several centuries later, Zen: direct experience over textual authority, practice over performance, presence over reputation (Suzuki, 1949). Bodhidharma wasn't interested in building a religion. He was interested in waking people up.


During those years, a monk named Huike came to him repeatedly, seeking instruction. Bodhidharma ignored him. On one particularly stark night — winter, snow falling — Huike stood in the cold and would not leave. When Bodhidharma finally acknowledged him and asked what he wanted, Huike said: 


'My mind is not at peace. Please pacify my mind.'


'Bring me your mind,' said Bodhidharma, 'and I will pacify it.'


Huike searched. He searched with the kind of honesty that searching inward requires.

'I cannot find it,' he said finally.


'There,' said Bodhidharma, 'I have pacified it for you' (Dumoulin, 2005).


Huike became the Second Patriarch of Chan Buddhism. The transmission had occurred — not through scripture, not through ceremony, but through a direct encounter with the nature of mind. This is the heart of the Bodhidharma parable.


Part Four: The Body Is Not Separate from the Spirit

There is another thread in the Bodhidharma legend that speaks directly to the physical dimension of his teaching. The monks at Shaolin, it is said, were not well. Long hours of sitting meditation had made them weak, stiff, and prone to falling asleep mid-practice. The spirit was willing; the body was failing its assignment.


Bodhidharma — again, whether the attribution is historically exact matters less than what it represents — is credited with teaching the monks exercises to restore and strengthen the body: the Yi Jin Jing (Muscle and Tendon Changing Classic) and the Xi Sui Jing (Marrow Washing Classic) (Jwing-Ming, 1989). From this tradition grew what eventually became known as Shaolin kung fu, one of the most influential martial arts lineages in human history.


The lesson embedded in this part of the parable is straightforward but easy to miss: you cannot cultivate the mind by abandoning the body. The body is the vehicle. Neglect the vehicle, and the journey stalls. This is not a metaphor unique to the East — any serious martial artist, any Zen practitioner, any military professional who has trained under genuine hardship understands this intuitively. The body and the mind are a single system, and they train together or not at all.


Part Five: The Leaving, and What Remained

Bodhidharma lived and taught for years at Shaolin before, according to tradition, he simply left. He had transmitted the teaching to Huike. His work, in his own understanding, was done. He headed west, back toward India, or perhaps simply toward wherever a man like Bodhidharma goes when he is finished.


A later account — probably legendary, definitely memorable — holds that he was met on the road by a Chinese official named Song Yun, who had been to Central Asia on a diplomatic mission. Song Yun saw Bodhidharma walking east, carrying a single sandal.


'Master,' said Song Yun, 'where are you going?'


'Back to India,' said Bodhidharma. 'Your emperor has died.'


Song Yun was puzzled. The emperor had been alive when he left. He continued west.


When he returned to the capital, he discovered that the emperor had indeed died — and that Bodhidharma had passed away. When the monks opened the tomb where Bodhidharma had been interred, they found it empty, except for a single sandal (Broughton, 1999). The other sandal, it seems, he had taken with him. To where, nobody could say.


This is how good teachers work. They leave a trace — not a monument, not an institution, not a dynasty of dependents. A single sandal. Enough to make you wonder. Enough to make you look.


Epilogue: What the Parable Is Actually About

Bodhidharma's story is not, in the end, a story about Buddhism, or martial arts, or even China. It is a story about a particular kind of courage: the courage to say 'no' to empty accumulation, to face the wall without flinching, to transmit something real at the cost of being difficult and strange.


Emperor Wu wanted a scoreboard. Bodhidharma told him the scoreboard was the problem. Most of us, if we're honest, have a little of the Emperor in us — we want our merit counted, our efforts recognized, our contribution tallied somewhere that matters. Bodhidharma's answer to that is not cruel. It's clarifying. The merit-counting is noise. The quiet facing of the wall is signal.


The tradition he seeded — Chan in China, Zen in Japan, and its countless descendants in martial arts, mindfulness practices, and contemplative traditions worldwide — is his second sandal. He left it for whoever was ready to pick it up.


The first sandal he kept. Some things you carry alone, all the way home.

 

References

Broughton, J. L. (1999). The Bodhidharma anthology: The earliest records of Zen. University of California Press.

Cleary, T., & Cleary, J. C. (Trans.). (1977). The blue cliff record. Shambhala Publications.

Dumoulin, H. (2005). Zen Buddhism: A history. Vol. 1: India and China (J. W. Heisig & P. Knitter, Trans.). World Wisdom. (Original work published 1988)

Ferguson, A. (2011). Zen's Chinese heritage: The masters and their teachings. Wisdom Publications.

Jwing-Ming, Y. (1989). Muscle/tendon changing and marrow/brain washing chi kung: The secret of youth. YMAA Publication Center.

McRae, J. R. (2003). Seeing through Zen: Encounter, transformation, and genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. University of California Press.

Suzuki, D. T. (1949). Essays in Zen Buddhism (First Series). Rider and Company.

 

CEJames & Akira Ichinose  |  Page

No comments: