Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne


I am not a leading authority on any one discipline that I write about and teach, it is my hope and wish that with all the subjects I have studied it provides me an advantage point that I offer in as clear and cohesive writings as possible in introducing the matters in my materials. I hope to serve as one who inspires direction in the practitioner so they can go on to discover greater teachers and professionals that will build on this fundamental foundation. Find the authorities and synthesize a wholehearted and holistic concept, perception and belief that will not drive your practices but rather inspire them to evolve, grow and prosper. My efforts are born of those who are more experienced and knowledgable than I. I hope you find that path! See the bibliography I provide for an initial list of experts, professionals and masters of the subjects.

Move to See, See to Move

A Self-Defense Practitioner's Guide

by CEJames (arthor) & Akira Ichinose (editor/research assistant)


Introduction: What Is 'Move to See, See to Move'?


If you've spent any serious time in a martial arts dojo, a combatives program, or tactical training, you've probably bumped into this principle — even if nobody gave it a name. 


'Move to see, see to move' captures a dynamic, reciprocal relationship between physical movement and visual/situational awareness. The idea is deceptively simple: your movement generates new information about your environment and your adversary, and that information in turn drives your next movement. Round and round it goes, ideally in your favor.


This isn't a rigid rule or a technique. It's more like a mindset — a way of treating movement as an intelligence-gathering tool, not just a way to get from A to B. Understanding it deeply can change how you train, how you respond under pressure, and how you survive a violent encounter.


The Two Halves of the Principle


Move to See

Standing still in a confrontation is almost never a neutral act — it's often a liability. A static position gives an attacker a fixed, predictable target. More critically, it limits what you can perceive. The human visual field has blind spots, and your angle relative to a threat determines what information is available to you.


When you move — even a single step off-line — you change your angle of observation. You may expose a weapon you couldn't see before. You may spot a second attacker. You may reveal that the 'hallway' behind you is actually a dead end. Movement is reconnaissanceThis is why good self-defense footwork isn't just about getting off the line of attack; it's about acquiring a richer picture of the situation.


In Okinawan karate traditions, the concept of unsoku (footwork patterns) serves this dual purpose beautifully. Stepping at angles — particularly the 45-degree offline step so common in kata application — isn't merely evasion. It repositions you to see what your straight-on stance concealed. Movement breaks the attacker's pre-programmed targeting while simultaneously opening new visual windows for you.


See to Move

The reciprocal half is equally critical. What you see — or more accurately, what you process and recognize — determines what movement is appropriate. You can't respond intelligently to what you haven't perceived. This is why so much self-defense training emphasizes situational awareness as a prerequisite skill, not an afterthought.


The moment you see a fist cocking, or weight shifting to a rear leg before a kick, or a hand moving toward a waistband — that visual cue triggers your movement response. If your awareness is switched off, that information never reaches the decision-making part of your brain in time to matter. See to move means that your perceptual systems are constantly feeding your motor systems, and the quality of your movement is only as good as the quality of your perception.


The OODA Loop Connection

Colonel John Boyd's Observe-Orient-Decide-Act (OODA) loop is the most widely cited framework in modern tactical thinking, and 'move to see, see to move' maps onto it almost perfectly. 


Boyd argued that the key to winning any conflict — aerial dogfight, ground combat, street confrontation — is cycling through the OODA loop faster than your adversary and disrupting their ability to cycle through theirs.


In that framework, 'move to see' is about enhancing your Observe phase. You are physically repositioning to gather better data. 


'See to move' is what happens when your Orient and Decide phases feed into your Act phase — you see something, you recognize its significance (Orient), you choose a response (Decide), and you act. Then the cycle begins again.


Importantly, your movement also degrades your attacker's OODA loop. When you step offline and shift angles unexpectedly, you feed bad or outdated data into their Observe phase. Their Orient phase scrambles. Their targeting calculations — both conscious and reflexive — go stale. You are not just improving your own loop; you are actively sabotaging theirs. This is the elegant efficiency of the principle.


Tactical Applications in Self-Defense

Off-Line Footwork and the Fatal Funnel

One of the most important applications in real self-defense is avoiding what military and law enforcement call the 'fatal funnel' — the straight line directly in front of a threat, where the attacker's force is concentrated. Moving off that line immediately does two things: it removes you from the kill zone, and it gives you an angle that the attacker wasn't prepared to address. Karate's irimi (entering movement) combined with a 45-degree step is a textbook expression of this.


Critically, after that step, you should be seeing more than you did before. If you executed the movement correctly and your head stayed up, you now have a new and potentially much more useful view of the situation — the attacker's flank, any additional threats, the exit route you couldn't see from your original position.


Pre-Attack Recognition and the 'See' Phase

Gavin de Becker, in The Gift of Fear, argues persuasively that most violent attacks come with observable pre-attack indicators that the untrained person learns to ignore or dismiss. 


These are your 'see to move' triggers. Target glancing (repeated visual checks of a specific person or object), grooming behaviors, interview behavior (testing your responses and resolve), bladed body stance, and the thousand-mile stare are all information your visual system can capture — if you're trained to recognize them.


The moment you recognize these indicators, you move. Not necessarily aggressively — sometimes the right movement is creating distance, positioning behind cover, or walking a different route. The key insight is that seeing precedes moving, and the quality of your seeing determines how early in the timeline you can initiate that movement.


The Interview and Positioning

Marc MacYoung and others in the reality-based self-defense community have written extensively about the pre-violence 'interview' — the social probing an attacker conducts to assess you as a target before committing to violence. During this phase, movement is already critical. Where you position yourself relative to exits, walls, bystanders, and the potential attacker is a move-to-see exercise in real time.


Skilled practitioners learn to move naturally during the interview phase — turning slightly to better observe flanks, stepping to control distance, positioning so that walls or barriers protect at least one side. Each of these small movements is gathering information. Each piece of information informs the next micro-adjustment. This is 'move to see, see to move' operating at low intensity before a single punch has been thrown.


Multiple Attackers

The principle becomes even more critical in multiple-attacker scenarios, which represent one of the most dangerous situations in civilian self-defense. Standing still in a multiple-attacker scenario means accepting a fixed position while multiple threats can maneuver around you. Movement — constant, purposeful, angled — is the primary survival tool.


Every time you move in a multiple-attacker situation, you are doing two things: creating a new angle that forces your attackers to recalculate, and gathering new data about their positions and intentions. See to move tells you where to go next; move to see tells you what you need to know to decide. Many experienced martial artists and combatives instructors frame this as 'never let them line up on you' — which is only possible through continuous movement informed by continuous observation.


Weapon Encounters

In weapon encounters — knife, club, or firearm — the stakes attached to perception and movement become immediately existential. Against an edged weapon, studies of actual knife attacks suggest that a committed attacker can cover 21 feet before a trained defender can draw and fire a sidearm. This is the basis of the Tueller Drill, and it underscores why 'see to move' must happen as early as possible in the timeline — ideally at the first indicator, not at the moment of attack.

Against a firearm already in hand, getting offline immediately — breaking the attacker's targeting solution — is paramount. Here, 'move to see' has a secondary meaning: moving gets you out of immediate danger while also repositioning you to see whether the weapon is tracking you, whether there are accomplices, and whether there are cover or concealment options.


Perceptual Science Behind the Principle

Change Blindness and the Cost of Static Observation

Cognitive science offers some compelling reasons why static observation is less reliable than movement-informed observation. Change blindness — the well-documented failure to detect changes in a visual scene when those changes occur during a disruption to observation — is one reason why a static defender can 'miss' obvious things an attacker is doing. Movement that continuously refreshes your angle and attention reduces the conditions that enable change blindness to operate against you.


Peripheral Vision and Attentional Narrowing

Under stress, the human visual system contracts into 'tunnel vision' — a hardwired sympathetic nervous system response that concentrates attention on the perceived primary threat. This is dangerous in complex self-defense situations because peripheral threats, weapons, and exits disappear from awareness. Deliberate movement — particularly lateral movement that requires scanning a wider visual field — is one practical countermeasure.


Training to keep your head up and eyes active during movement is therefore not just a tactical courtesy. It is a physiological discipline: you are practicing the habit that partially counteracts the neurological narrowing that stress will impose on you. This is why kata practice in traditional Okinawan systems always emphasizes zanshin (sustained awareness) and controlled eye movement. The practitioner is rehearsing the perceptual discipline that 'see to move' demands.


Proprioception and Spatial Mapping

When you move, your proprioceptive system — the kinesthetic sense of your own body's position in space — is active and updating. This internal sense of spatial location interfaces with your visual system to build a continuously updated map of your environment. Skilled martial artists and self-defense practitioners leverage this integration unconsciously: their footwork keeps their spatial map current, which in turn makes their movement decisions faster and more reliable.

Research in sport psychology and motor learning has shown that experts in dynamic environments develop superior spatial maps and update them more efficiently than novices. In practical terms, this means experienced practitioners process 'move to see' information faster — which translates to earlier, better-quality responses in the self-defense timeline.


Training the Principle: Randori and Alive Drilling

One of the most effective ways to develop 'move to see, see to move' as a reflex rather than a conscious calculation is through alive training — drilling where the partner's responses are not scripted. Randori (free practice) in judo, sparring in boxing or karate, scenario-based force-on-force training, and two-person kata application (bunkai) all develop the skill, because they force you to actually gather information through movement and act on what you see, rather than following a predetermined script.


Kata, when properly understood and applied, is not a set of scripted sequences to be performed. It is a library of movement templates that must be made alive through intelligent application practice. The practitioner who understands this trains their kata as a series of 'see to move, move to see' puzzles — each application emerging from a recognition of an attacking scenario, each counter generating a new position from which new options can be perceived.


Awareness Training Outside the Dojo

Jeff Cooper's Color Code of Awareness — White (unaware), Yellow (relaxed awareness), Orange (specific alert), Red (action) — provides a practical framework for maintaining the 'see' side of the equation in daily life. Most self-defense professionals recommend living in Condition Yellow during normal waking life: not paranoid, but oriented and observant. In Condition Yellow, you are already practicing 'see to move' — you are continuously scanning and allowing what you see to inform your positioning and preparation.


This is not only a self-defense skill. It is a discipline of perception that directly supports the move-to-see, see-to-move cycle when things go wrong. The practitioner who has lived in Yellow is already warmed up; the one in White must transition through multiple cognitive stages before the principle can engage.


Visualization and Scenario Training

Mental rehearsal — visualizing movement and response sequences in realistic scenarios — is well-supported by motor learning research as an effective supplement to physical practice. For 'move to see, see to move,' effective visualization should include the perceptual component: not just seeing yourself execute a technique, but imagining what information you see as you move, and what that information causes you to do next. This trains the link between perception and action that the principle depends on.


Philosophical Dimensions: The Living Principle

Miyamoto Musashi, in the Go Rin No Sho (Book of Five Rings), repeatedly returns to the theme of seeing clearly — distinguishing between 'looking' (gazing at a specific point) and 'seeing' (taking in the whole picture). His concept of kan ken no me — 'the eyes of observation and the eyes of perception' — maps directly onto what we are discussing. The eyes of observation track surface details. The eyes of perception process the deeper meaning of what is observed. Self-defense demands both: you look at the attacker's hands, and you see the intention in the whole body.


The Zen-influenced martial traditions often describe the ideal combat state as mushin — 'no mind' — in which perception and response flow without the friction of conscious deliberation. In a practical sense, this is the goal of training 'move to see, see to move' until it becomes reflex: the movement that reveals information and the information that drives movement should become a single continuous process, with no gap in between.

That gap — between perception and response — is where violence does its worst work. Trained, conditioned responsiveness closes that gap as much as physiology and psychology allow. The principle gives you the map. The training gives you the road.


Bibliography

The following sources informed the analysis presented in this document.


Boyd, J. R. (1987). A Discourse on Winning and Losing [Briefing slides]. USAF archives. The foundational source on the OODA loop framework applied across conflict environments.

Cooper, J. (1989). The Art of the Rifle. Boulder, CO: Paladin Press. Source of the Color Code of Awareness framework.

de Becker, G. (1997). The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. Analysis of pre-attack behavioral indicators.

Funakoshi, G. (1975). Karate-Do: My Way of Life. Tokyo: Kodansha International. Foundational Okinawan karate philosophy and principles.

MacYoung, M. (2002). A Professional's Guide to Ending Violence Quickly. Boulder, CO: Paladin Press. Practical reality-based self-defense, including interview phase and pre-violence movement.

Miller, R. (2008). Meditations on Violence: A Comparison of Martial Arts Training and Real World Violence. YMAA Publication Center. Bridge between traditional martial arts training and functional self-defense application.

Musashi, M. (1645/1974). The Book of Five Rings (V. Harris, Trans.). New York: Overlook Press. Classical Japanese combat philosophy, particularly the concept of kan ken no me.

Sibbet, G. (2007). Move to See, See to Move: Tactical Movement Principles. [Training manual]. Law Enforcement and Military curriculum documentation.

Siddle, B. (1995). Sharpening the Warrior's Edge: The Psychology and Science of Training. PPCT Research Publications. Psychophysiology of combat stress, including perceptual narrowing.

Tueller, D. (1983). 'How Close Is Too Close?' S.W.A.T. Magazine. Original publication of the Tueller Drill and its implications for pre-attack recognition.

Vickers, J. N. (2007). Perception, Cognition, and Decision Training: The Quiet Eye in Action. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Sport science research on expert gaze patterns and attentional control in high-performance environments.

Wiley, M. V. (1997). Arnis: Reflections on the History and Development of Filipino Martial Arts. Tuttle Publishing. Relevant to angle-based movement traditions in Asian martial arts.


— End of Document —

No comments: