Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Isshinryu Basics and Kata - A Hypothesis

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

It just occurred to me from a recent article of a translation of a meeting that was held some time around 1936 it was said that there were two distinct teachings of kata, one a fundamental and the second a primary referred to with the term, Kaishu. A quote, “Established as the two types of kata to be taught in all karate circa meeting of 1936, i.e., fundamental kata to principle (gensoku-gata 原則型) karate kata.”

I think that, “Kihon kata (fundamental kata) [基本型] fundamental form; basic form; basic pattern; basic model; basic type; prototype.” Then I came up with the possibility that when Isshinryu was in the throws of its birthing over the years Tatsuo-san worked out the details that he took away the fundamental kata and replaced them with what he calls, “Upper and Lower Basics.” He then adopted those kata he deemed applicable, critical and most viable for his style into those that would have been taught as principled kata or as the article called it, “Kaishu kata.” 

This change brought about kihon or basics leaving all the kata for the principle or primary system/style kata, the eight empty hand kata that comprised the kata of Isshinryu. This would help explain why so many other systems or styles teach the kata and the advanced kata, i.e., what was originally thought of as fundamental kata and kaishu kata (Primary or principle kata of the style).

Therefore, “Karate no kata (Kata or Kaishu kata, other than kihon kata) [空手の型] means kata (in karate).”

Granted, this theory and/or hypothesis is a stretch and only substantiated by the article translated on the meeting of karate masters in the year 1936 that also alludes to what I term as educational institution karate by the changes referred to so that martial arts and especially karate could be properly implemented into the educational system of both Japan and Okinawa. It is also of note that such changes were meant to also include changing the more dangerous karate into a sport with uniforms and other accoutrements necessary for the country, the war effort and most of all the growth and commercial enterprising of karate of Okinawa. 

Even if not true, correct or even relevant to modern karate it makes a nice story that could be how it came to be. Let me add one more point, the article expressed efforts to convert to sport therefore those who may have studied karate after 1936, in all probability, learned the edu-sport version of karate that means the karate taught to the Americans may have been all, or mostly, the edu-sport karate that lives on in modern times. 

It also occurs to me that since Tatsuo-san was supposedly a student of some of those masters who practiced a dangerous version before the 1936 recommended conversions may have taught Tatsuo-san those dangerous aspects that gave him the inspiration to change his karate into the new version of Isshinryu. Mere theory not substantiated by any kind of accepted proofs but a good story just the same.

p.s. You know I am writing this because I like to see the Isshinryu purists go monkey dancing across a thread of discontent on the Internet of Things socially driven, Muahahahahahaha 

Bibliography (Click the link)



No comments: