Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Stances: An Observation

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

Natural stances allow the type of movement necessary in self-defense while the often wide and deep stances are not.

The wide and deep are wonderful tools for exercise and keeping the legs strong, flexible (especially the mobility of the hips) and ???.

But, and you knew there was going to be a but, the are not good for self-defense, fighting or combatives. Deep stances reduce, limit and most of all STOP the momentum of you body mass required for power and force. In addition they require you to expose yourself as they result in a pause to reestablish moving and movement.

This does not occur with natural stances for the type of movement that allows you to instantly change tactics involving legs and movement and stability, etc., necessary for self-defense.

BUT, you knew there would be another but, this does not mean that deep stances don’t have a purpose it is just the deep stances in self-defense have a very limited purpose. At least from where I sit, deep stances are awesome when the power and force generation comes from the attacker attacking. In other words when you can use their mass movement as it approaches against them so taking a deep stance for stability, structure and the application of a methodology that actually relies on the attackers mass as it moves toward you to really apply a technique based on the proper methodology while applying principles to achieve a goal. 

BUT, you knew there would be yet another but, most rely on the deep stances assuming they are the best stance for the greatest application of force and power but in truth, not so much. 

First, assuming deep stances actually require more movement and that movement is a tell while the shorter, faster and natural stances with movement are much less likely to tell your attacker and allow you the freedom of movement necessary to get-r-done. 

Second, once in a deep stance and only if the attacker provides you the force and power to achieve a goal your strikes are going to be less powerful and less forceful and that means the attacker has an advantage. Add in that if your move and application fails the extra time and movement you have to do to leave that stance and move again is also a tell and it provides your attacker more time to act, time to act against you putting you on the defense and defending puts you at a disadvantage in an attack as in a self-defense situation. 

This once again also points out the importance of fundamental principles but more important their application in applying multiple methodologies in a self-defense situation. Mobility and speed are paramount and natural stances, provided you have time to use them cause most likely the attack was a complete surprise and your balance and structure were disrupted, so having multiple methodologies and an ability to utilize principles over technique based tactics will give you an opportunity to take back the advantage the attacker got right off the starting line. 

This is just my observation and theory toward a hypothesis toward a more applicable self-defense strategy to survive for survival is the real name of the game of life. Look at it as critical thinking so that one can practice and train so the “sensory motor predictions” of your brain, from the lizard, and create an internal model that will play a critical role in the motor actions necessary to get-r-done. 

I quote, “Our brains construction and make up permit us to transcend stimulus-response behavior, and instead confers the ability to make predictions ahead of actual sensory input. It is the prediction ability that allows us to execute a motor command compensating for the stimuli from vision to brain to be shortened so the hand meets the target through the predictions the brain uses to make it work and that is where training, etc., comes into play.”

The overall idea is to train and encode the brain, the mind, so that we optimize our actions toward survival while deep stances do have benefits in self-defense the likelihood of getting-r-done lies more in optimizing all our movements reducing tells and lengthening our lines so that we get-r-done quickly and efficiently while staying within the self-defense square. 

Bibliography (Click the link)


1 comment:

John Vesia said...

Self-defense against headlock: Drop into deep shiko-dachi hooking single leg behind attackers leg for takedown. This is kuzushi. Long deep stances tend to work well to disrupt while maintaining one's own balance. Useless for sparring, but self-defense applications are sometimes valid.

Nice breakdown here:
https://fightsciencesresearchinstitute.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/demystifying-stances-kiba-dachi-and-shiko-dachi/