Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne


I am not a leading authority on any one discipline that I write about and teach, it is my hope and wish that with all the subjects I have studied it provides me an advantage point that I offer in as clear and cohesive writings as possible in introducing the matters in my materials. I hope to serve as one who inspires direction in the practitioner so they can go on to discover greater teachers and professionals that will build on this fundamental foundation. Find the authorities and synthesize a wholehearted and holistic concept, perception and belief that will not drive your practices but rather inspire them to evolve, grow and prosper. My efforts are born of those who are more experienced and knowledgable than I. I hope you find that path! See the bibliography I provide for an initial list of experts, professionals and masters of the subjects.

LIKE WATER

Sun Tzu's Most Profound Metaphor and What It Means for Self-Defense

A Narrative Essay in Conversational Style

by CEJames (researcher/author) & Akira Ichinose (editor/research assistant)


Based on Sun Tzu's Art of War, Chapter VI: Weak Points and Strong

 

DISCLAIMER

The content presented here is for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a certified self-defense methodology. Laws governing the use of force vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult a qualified attorney and seek instruction from a certified self-defense professional before making any decisions regarding personal protection.


The Old General's Riddle

Imagine sitting across from an old general — not a loud man, not a man who fills a room with bluster. He's the kind of man who watches. After a long silence, he leans forward and says: "Tell me, do you know what defeats every enemy, fills every vessel, and never loses a fight?"

You guess swords. Armies. Strategy. He shakes his head at each one.


"Water," he says. "The answer is always water."


That general is Sun Tzu — or at least the voice behind The Art of War, written sometime around the fifth century BC in China. And that riddle isn't a riddle at all. It's the heart of his entire philosophy, spelled out plainly in Chapter VI:


"Now water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; the soldier works out his victory in relation to the foe whom he is facing."


For military commanders, that passage is about battlefield flexibility. For you, standing in a parking lot at night or squared off against someone who just shoved you — it means something even more immediate. Let's talk about what it actually means, and why it might be the most practical piece of self-defense wisdom ever written.

 

First: What Did Sun Tzu Actually Say?

It helps to know the exact passage. In Chapter VI, Sun Tzu writes (in the Lionel Giles translation, widely used in martial arts circles):


"Water has no constant form. There are no constant conditions in warfare."


"He who can modify his tactics in relation to his opponent and thereby succeed in winning, may be called a heaven-born captain."


He also writes:


"In warfare, avoid what is strong and strike at what is weak, just as water avoids high ground and flows to low ground."


Three things jump out here. 


  • Water is shapeless — it has no preferred form. 
  • Water is smart — it doesn't waste energy going uphill. 
  • And water is inevitable — given time, it always finds a way through. 


Sun Tzu isn't being poetic for the sake of it. He's describing a combat principle that took him decades of campaign experience to distill into a single image. And that image transfers, almost perfectly, to the context of personal self-defense.

 

The Shape of No Shape

Why Rigid Fighters Lose

Here's something every experienced martial artist knows and most beginners resist: the person who shows up with a fixed plan almost always loses. The fighter who has drilled one technique so deeply that it's the only tool in the kit is the combat equivalent of a boulder sitting in a riverbed — imposing, but ultimately going nowhere.


Sun Tzu understood this about armies. A general who commits his forces to a single formation, regardless of terrain, enemy disposition, or weather, is already defeated. The same principle applies when it's just two people — or three, or four — and the violence is happening right now, up close and personal.


In the Isshin-ryu tradition, and in serious Okinawan karate generally, the kata aren't meant to be performed at the enemy like a script. They're a library of principles. You learn the form precisely so that you can abandon the form when the moment demands itThe bunkai — the applied interpretations — are starting points for understanding, not scripts for execution. The idea is always the same: know the technique deeply enough that you don't have to think about the technique. Then you can think about the fight.


That's what Sun Tzu means by water having no constant form. It's not chaos. It's disciplined responsiveness.


What Shapelessness Looks Like in Practice

Say someone grabs your wrist. You've drilled wrist releases a hundred times. But your attacker doesn't let go the way your training partner does. He twists, he pulls, he steps inside your space. The rigid response — execute the drill — fails immediately. The water response reads what just happened and flows to the new shape of the problem. Maybe that's an elbow. Maybe that's a step back and a palm to the face. Maybe that's simply turning in the direction of the pull rather than fighting it. Water doesn't argue with the river bank. It goes around.


The Gracies figured this out for ground fighting. Bruce Lee, who studied and critiqued classical martial arts extensively, kept coming back to this principle — he called it "be like water" explicitly, and that phrase eventually became one of the most quoted bits of martial wisdom in popular culture. Lee got it from Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu got it from watching rivers.

 

Avoid Strength, Strike Weakness

The Economy of Force

The second great lesson of the water metaphor is about efficiency. Water does not push against high ground. It doesn't try to climb a cliff face. It finds the low spot, the gap, the soft earth, and it goes there. Over time — and sometimes quite quickly — it carves right through stone. Not by strength, but by patience and position.


In self-defense, this is probably the single most important tactical concept you can internalize: don't fight strength with strength. You will almost certainly encounter someone bigger, stronger, angrier, and more committed to violence than you are. The person who initiates an attack usually has the physical and psychological edge at the moment of initiation — they've decided, they've committed, they're moving. You are reacting.


Sun Tzu's water principle says: 

don't go where the strength is. Go where it isn't. That means targeting vulnerable anatomy rather than trying to overpower muscle mass. Eyes, throat, groin, knees — these are the low ground. They are anatomically consistent regardless of your attacker's size or training. A thumb in the eye works whether the person attached to it is 150 pounds or 250 pounds.


The Geometry of Attack

There's also a spatial dimension to this principle. If someone presents their strong side — dominant hand forward, weight centered and balanced — you don't engage that directly. You angle off. You step to the outside of the lead foot, not into the centerline. Suddenly you're attacking from an angle they didn't expect, and their strength is aimed at nothing.


Musashi wrote about this in The Book of Five Rings — the principle of attacking the corners rather than the face of a formation. He arrived at the same water-principle independently, from a different tradition, in a different century. That kind of convergence tells you something. These ideas keep appearing because they're not cultural artifacts. They're descriptions of physical reality.


The Okinawan masters 

built this into their kata deliberately. Watch Seisan or Sanchin with eyes that are looking for geometry rather than technique, and you start to see the angles everywhere. The turns, the shifts in weight, the off-line steps — these are all ways of doing what water does: going where the ground allows, not where pride demands.

 

Constant Change, No Constants

The Danger of a Fixed Mindset

Sun Tzu's third point in the water passage is the most philosophically demanding: there are no constants in combat. Not in warfare, and not in self-defense. What worked yesterday may not work today. What works in the dojo — controlled environment, known partner, agreed-upon rules — may not work in the street, where there are no rules, the ground is uneven, and your attacker hasn't read any of the same books you have.


This is a hard pill for serious practitioners to swallow. You've invested thousands of hours in your art. You've earned your rank. You have techniques that work beautifully in training. And then someone who has never stepped on a mat grabs you from behind in a parking garage and all of that accumulated knowledge has to flow into an entirely new shape — immediately, correctly, without hesitation.


The fixed mindset says: I know the counter to this, let me run it. The water mindset says: what is this, actually? What is the true shape of this threat? And then it responds to what's actually there, not what's expected.


Condition Zero

Jeff Cooper's color code system — White, Yellow, Orange, Red — describes states of awareness rather than techniques. Sun Tzu's water principle applies to the transition between those states as much as it does to the physical response. A person locked in Condition White (unaware, tuned out) is not just tactically disadvantaged — they're already moving uphill against the current. They've allowed the attacker to choose the terrain. The water response starts earlier, with awareness. You read the environment. You notice the anomaly. You begin shaping your response before the violence begins, because water doesn't wait for the cliff before it starts seeking the low ground.


That's why experienced self-defense instructors talk so much about pre-incident indicators — the behavioral tells that precede an attack. The interview. The positioning. The hands becoming visible or invisible. Reading those signs is the first application of water-thinking. You're not waiting for the situation to force your hand. You're flowing ahead of it.

 

The Moral Dimension of Flowing Water

Proportionality and the Water Principle

There's one more layer here that doesn't get discussed enough in most self-defense contexts: the water metaphor has a built-in proportionality principle. 

Water doesn't use more force than the terrain requires. It doesn't blast through a soft hillside with the force of a dam break. It flows to the degree the obstacle allows. When the obstacle is hard, water is patient. When there's an opening, water is swift. The response is always calibrated to what's actually in front of it.


This matters legally and ethically. In Nevada, as in most jurisdictions, lawful self-defense must be proportional — the force you use must be reasonable given the threat you face. An attacker who shoves you doesn't justify lethal force. An attacker who is beating you unconscious does. The law is asking you to do what water does: read the actual terrain and respond accordingly, not with maximum force by default.


The person who has internalized Sun Tzu's water principle is, paradoxically, a safer and more ethical defender. They're not running scripts. They're not locked into a response calibrated for a different threat. They're seeing what's actually there and responding to that — which means they're much less likely to over-respond, and much more likely to apply exactly the right amount of force at the right moment.


After the Fight

Water also recedes. It doesn't linger at the scene of its work. Once the ground has changed — once the threat has passed, the obstacle has moved, the flood has run its course — water flows on. The warrior who has internalized this doesn't keep fighting after the fight is over. They disengage, they move, they take stock. The continuing assault — the extra strikes after an opponent is clearly incapacitated — is not water. It's something else, and it's both legally and morally dangerous.


Rory Miller, in his work on violence and self-defense, talks about the difference between fighting and violence. Violence, he argues, is a tool. You use the tool as long as the task requires, and then you put it down. That's water. The inability to stop — to keep going because the adrenaline is still flowing — is the frozen form, the non-adaptive response. It is everything Sun Tzu's water is not.

 

Putting It Together: The Water Warrior

So what does it actually look like to practice Sun Tzu's water principle in your self-defense training and mindset? Here are some things worth sitting with:


Train for principles, not just techniques. Every technique you drill should give you insight into the underlying principle — the angle, the disruption, the anatomical target — so that when the technique doesn't fit the situation, you can apply the principle with something else.

Drill de-escalation as hard as you drill striking. Water avoids high ground. If there's a way out that doesn't require violence, that is the low ground. Take it. The fight you don't have is always the one you win cleanest.


Stay in Yellow. Condition Yellow — relaxed awareness, no specific threat — is the resting state of the water-mind. It takes no particular effort. It simply notices. From Yellow, you can read terrain. From White, you can't.


Study your failures in training. The moment your technique gets countered, your plan gets disrupted, or your partner does something you didn't expect — that's the most important moment in the training session. That's the high ground showing itself. Learn to flow around it.

Understand proportionality as a martial value, not just a legal one. The person who can calibrate their response — not because they're calculating liability but because they genuinely see the threat clearly — is operating from the water principle at the deepest level.


And finally: 

accept that the fight will not look the way you expect. This is the hardest one. The scenario in your head — the single attacker, the clear engagement, the clean technique — is a training artifact. Reality is messier, faster, and stranger. Water doesn't expect the terrain. It reads it. Every time. That's why it always finds a way through.

 

Closing: The River's Lesson

Sun Tzu wrote The Art of War for generals commanding armies across mountain ranges and river valleys. He did not write it for a 44-year-old practitioner of Isshin-ryu karate standing in a Nevada parking lot at midnight. But the principles don't know that. They apply wherever two forces meet, wherever one person must prevail against another, wherever the terrain is uncertain and the outcome is not guaranteed.


Water wins. Not because it's the strongest thing. Not because it never encounters resistance. But because it never wastes energy on the impossible, it always finds the opening, and it never — not once — forgets that the ground can change.


Be like water. The old general knew exactly what he was talking about.

 

A Note on Accuracy

The quotations attributed to Sun Tzu are paraphrases drawing from Chapter VI ("Weak Points and Strong") of The Art of War. The Lionel Giles translation (1910) and the Thomas Cleary translation (1988) are both referenced. The phrase "be like water" is commonly attributed to Bruce Lee from a 1971 television interview; its debt to Taoist thought and Sun Tzu's water passages is well documented in martial arts scholarship. Jeff Cooper's color code system appears in his work Principles of Personal Defense (1972). Rory Miller's distinction between fighting and violence appears in Meditations on Violence (2008). Musashi's principle of attacking corners is from The Book of Five Rings (c. 1645). All interpretations applied to self-defense and Okinawan karate are the author's synthesis.

 

Bibliography

Cleary, Thomas, trans. The Art of War: Sun Tzu. Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1988.

Cooper, Jeff. Principles of Personal Defense. Boulder: Paladin Press, 1972.

Giles, Lionel, trans. Sun Tzu on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World. London: Luzac & Co., 1910. (Public domain; widely available.)

Lee, Bruce. Tao of Jeet Kune Do. Burbank: Ohara Publications, 1975.

Miller, Rory. Meditations on Violence: A Comparison of Martial Arts Training and Real World Violence. Wolfeboro: YMAA Publication Center, 2008.

Miller, Rory. Facing Violence: Preparing for the Unexpected. Wolfeboro: YMAA Publication Center, 2011.

Musashi, Miyamoto. The Book of Five Rings. Translated by Thomas Cleary. Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1993. (Original c. 1645.)

Nakayama, Masatoshi. Dynamic Karate. Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1966.

Shimabuku, Tatsuo. Isshin-Ryu Karate. Oral tradition and dojo instructional lineage, Kyan-influenced Okinawan system, documented through lineage holders including Harold Long and Don Nagle.

Van Horne, William, and Jason Riley. Left of Bang: How the Marine Corps' Combat Hunter Program Can Save Your Life. New York: Black Irish Entertainment, 2014.

Page

No comments: