Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne


I am not a leading authority on any one discipline that I write about and teach, it is my hope and wish that with all the subjects I have studied it provides me an advantage point that I offer in as clear and cohesive writings as possible in introducing the matters in my materials. I hope to serve as one who inspires direction in the practitioner so they can go on to discover greater teachers and professionals that will build on this fundamental foundation. Find the authorities and synthesize a wholehearted and holistic concept, perception and belief that will not drive your practices but rather inspire them to evolve, grow and prosper. My efforts are born of those who are more experienced and knowledgable than I. I hope you find that path! See the bibliography I provide for an initial list of experts, professionals and masters of the subjects.

Officially Sanctioned MA Titles of Japan, Okinawa, and China

 Titles for martial arts teachers are highly formalized in JapanOkinawa, and China, and they reflect not just technical skill but also cultural values like respect, hierarchy, and tradition. Below is a breakdown of the officially sanctioned or historically recognized titles across these three traditions.


1. Japanese Martial Arts (Budō & Koryū)


Japanese martial arts use a system of honorifics rooted in Confucian and feudal traditions.

Sensei (先生) – “One who has gone before”

The most common term for teacher, used in karate, judo, kendo, aikido, etc. [Draeger, Classical Bujutsu, 1973]

Shihan (師範) – “Master instructor”

Title for a high-ranking teacher officially licensed to teach and represent the style. Often granted around 5th–6th dan and above. [Amdur, Old School: Essays on Japanese Martial Traditions, 2002]

Hanshi (範士) – “Model teacher”

An honorific used in arts such as karate, kendo, iaido; denotes a senior figure who is a role model of skill and character, usually 8th dan or higher. [Cook, Shotokan Karate: A Precise History, 2001]

Kyōshi (教士) – “Teacher/expert”

Mid-to-high level teaching title, often between Renshi and Hanshi. [Nelson, Kendo: The Definitive Guide, 2002]

Renshi (錬士) – “Polished expert”

A title indicating a polished instructor, often given around 4th–6th dan. [Friday, Legacies of the Sword, 1997]

Sōke (宗家) – “Head of the family”

The hereditary or appointed head of a martial arts tradition (especially in koryū). [Draeger, Classical Bujutsu, 1973]

Shidōin (指導員) – “Instructor”

A recognized teacher, often of middle dan rank. [Amdur, 2002]


2. Okinawan Martial Arts (Karate & Kobudō)


Okinawan titles overlap with Japanese ones due to cultural exchange, but also reflect unique Okinawan traditions.

Sensei (先生) – Common usage as in Japan. [Cook, 2001]

Shihan (師範) – Senior instructor, often used for dojo heads and high-ranking teachers. [Nagamine, The Essence of Okinawan Karate-dō, 1976]

Kaichō (会長) – “President” or head of an organization, used for leaders of associations. [Bishop, Okinawan Karate, 1999]

Sōke (宗家) – Used in some Okinawan systems for the head of a style or family tradition. [Bishop, 1999]

Hanshi, Kyōshi, Renshi – Adopted from Japanese budō ranking systems, especially post–WWII when karate was systematized. [Cook, 2001]


3. Chinese Martial Arts (Wǔshù / Kung Fu)


Chinese martial arts titles emphasize familial structures rather than institutional rank. Titles vary by region (Mandarin vs. Cantonese usage).

Shīfu / Sifu (師父 / 師傅) – “Teacher-father”

The most common term, signifying both technical teacher and moral guide. [Kennedy & Guo, Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals, 2005]

Shī (師) – “Teacher/Master”

General term used in combinations, e.g. Laoshī (老師) “old teacher.” [Henning, Martial Arts of the World, 2001]

Zhǎngmén (掌門) – “Gatekeeper / Head of the school”

Refers to the head of a lineage or style. [Lorge, Chinese Martial Arts: From Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century, 2012]

Shīgōng (師公) – “Grandmaster / teacher’s teacher”

Used to denote a teacher two generations above (your teacher’s teacher). [Kennedy & Guo, 2005]

Shīzǔ (師祖) – “Ancestral master”

Refers to the founder of a lineage. [Lorge, 2012]

Sīxiōng / Sījie / Sīdì / Sīmèi (師兄 / 師姐 / 師弟 / 師妹) – Senior/junior brother/sister

Titles marking one’s place within the martial family, similar to dojo senpai/kōhai relationships. [Henning, 2001]

Lǎoshī (老師) – “Respected teacher”

Used more formally, sometimes in modern wǔshù schools. [Shahar, The Shaolin Monastery, 2008]


Comparative Notes

Japanese/Okinawan systems are more bureaucratic (formal licensing: Renshi, Kyōshi, Hanshi).

Chinese systems are more familial (Sifu, Sigung, lineage-based).

Both emphasize moral authority as much as technical mastery.


✅ References

Draeger, D. (1973). Classical Bujutsu. Weatherhill.

Amdur, E. (2002). Old School: Essays on Japanese Martial Traditions. Edgework.

Cook, H. (2001). Shotokan Karate: A Precise History.

Nagamine, S. (1976). The Essence of Okinawan Karate-dō. Tuttle.

Bishop, M. (1999). Okinawan Karate. A & C Black.

Nelson, R. (2002). Kendo: The Definitive Guide. Kodansha.

Friday, K. (1997). Legacies of the Sword. University of Hawaii Press.

Kennedy, B., & Guo, E. (2005). Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals. Blue Snake.

Henning, S. (2001). Martial Arts of the World: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.

Lorge, P. (2012). Chinese Martial Arts: From Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press.

Shahar, M. (2008). The Shaolin Monastery. University of Hawaii Press.


----------

American Titles


In the American martial arts world, there isn’t one unified system of officially sanctioned teaching titles like in Japan, Okinawa, or China. Instead, U.S. martial arts teachers generally adopt titles from the tradition they practice (Japanese, Okinawan, Korean, Chinese, etc.), sometimes blending them with organizationally sanctioned ranks.


That said, in the American context, certain titles have become widely recognized and “officially sanctioned” within federations, associations, and national governing bodies. Here’s an overview:


1. Common American Martial Arts Teacher Titles


These are used across multiple styles in the U.S. and often recognized by national/international federations:

Instructor / Head Instructor – The most straightforward English title, sanctioned in many U.S.-based organizations (e.g., USA KarateUSA Taekwondo).

Refers to a formally recognized teacher responsible for running a school or program.

USANKF (USA National Karate Federation) recognizes Instructor/Coach certifications.

Master / Grandmaster – Popular in Korean and Americanized martial arts (especially Taekwondo, Tang Soo Do, and eclectic American systems).

Master is often awarded to black belts of 4th–6th dan.

Grandmaster is often awarded to 7th–9th dan, sometimes organizational heads.

USATKD Dan Promotion Guidelines sanction these titles.

Professor – Used in some Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu schools in the U.S. for black belt instructors, reflecting Portuguese usage.

Gracie University and other BJJ federations recognize this.

Coach – Official title in U.S. combat sports and Olympic martial arts.

Used in USA JudoUSA KarateUSA Taekwondo, and MMA federations.

USA Judo Coach Certification Program regulates this term.


2. Borrowed Japanese/Okinawan Titles Used in America


American karate, judo, aikido, and kendo organizations formally sanction the same titles used in Japan:

Sensei – Universally adopted in U.S. dojos.

Shihan – Used in U.S. branches of Japanese/Okinawan systems for high-level instructors.

Renshi / Kyoshi / Hanshi – Titles sanctioned by American federations like the International Karate Kobudo Federation (IKKF) or Shito-Kai USA.


[Cook, Shotokan Karate: A Precise History, 2001] notes how American karate federations standardized these titles after WWII occupation.


3. Borrowed Chinese Titles Used in America


American Kung Fu and Tai Chi schools use traditional Chinese familial titles:

Sifu (師父) – Adopted as the standard for teachers.

Sigung (師公) – Grandmaster or teacher’s teacher.

Laoshi (老師) – Teacher, sometimes used in modern U.S. Wushu schools.


Recognized by organizations like the United States Wushu-Kungfu Federation (USAWKF).

[Henning, Martial Arts of the World, 2001] confirms these titles’ adoption in America.


4. Unique “Americanized” Titles


Some U.S. martial arts organizations created their own hierarchies:

Chief Instructor / Headmaster – Common in eclectic American martial arts schools.

Founder – Used when a U.S. martial artist creates a new style (e.g., Ed Parker in American Kenpo, Chuck Norris in Chun Kuk Do).

Grandmaster (in American Kenpo and eclectic systems) – Used similarly to Chinese/Korean traditions but codified by American federations.

Example: [International Kenpo Karate Association (IKKA)] founded by Ed Parker.


 References

Cook, H. (2001). Shotokan Karate: A Precise History.

Henning, S. (2001). Martial Arts of the World: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.

Bishop, M. (1999). Okinawan Karate.

USANKF (USA National Karate Federation) – Instructor/Coach certifications.

USA Taekwondo – Dan Promotion Guidelines.

USA Judo – Coach Certification Program.

United States Wushu-Kungfu Federation (USAWKF) – Official guidelines on titles and recognition.

Gracie University – Instructor hierarchy.


🔍 So, in short:

America has no single nationally “official” title system—instead, it uses a mix of federation-sanctioned English terms (Instructor, Coach, Master) and borrowed cultural titles(Sensei, Sifu, Professor).


------------

Unofficial American Titles


The unofficial titles that are commonly used in American martial arts schools but are not formally sanctioned by traditional Japanese, Okinawan, Chinese, or even American federations. These are often cultural borrowings, marketing tools, or student-given honorifics that grew out of the U.S. martial arts boom (1950s–present).


1. Inflated or Self-Styled Titles


Many American martial artists (especially in independent or “garage dojo” settings) have used grandiose, unofficial titles to legitimize their authority. These are not recognized by traditional federations.

Supreme Grandmaster / Great Grandmaster – Extensions of the “Grandmaster” title (legitimate in some Korean/Chinese traditions). In the U.S., sometimes self-awarded or bestowed by small organizations.

Example discussed in: Bowman, P. (2017). Martial Arts Studies: Disrupting Disciplinary Boundaries.

Sōke (宗家) – In Japan, the hereditary head of a system. In the U.S., often used by people who “found” their own martial art system.

Bishop, M. (1999). Okinawan Karate describes how Americans appropriated this term.

Kancho (館長) – Officially means “head of a training hall” in Japan, but in the U.S. it is sometimes inflated into a lofty leadership title.

Amdur, E. (2002). Old School.


2. Culturally Hybrid / Americanized Titles


Borrowed and blended titles that sound “exotic” but don’t exist in the original languages.

Soke-Dai / Hanshi-Dai – Pseudo-Japanese titles used in America to mean “assistant headmaster” or “acting master.” Not traditionally sanctioned in Japan.

Shodai Soke – Literally “first-generation headmaster,” often used by American founders of hybrid styles.

Doshu (道主) – Official in Aikido lineage for Ueshiba’s descendants, but many American teachers adopt it for themselves unofficially.

Source: Green, T. & Svinth, J. (2010). Martial Arts of the World: An Encyclopedia of History and Innovation.


3. Student-Given Honorifics in America


Sometimes students in the U.S. confer titles on their teachers informally, outside formal sanction:

Professor – While legitimate in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu for black belts, in America it is also loosely used for respected senior teachers in karate and kung fu who don’t have that tradition.

Doc / Doctor – Used when the teacher has a PhD, honorary doctorate, or “martial arts doctorate” from unaccredited institutions.

Reverend Master / Pastor Master – Found in martial arts schools with strong religious or church affiliations.


Reference: Donohue, J. (1994). Warriors Dreams: The Martial Arts and the American Imagination.


4. Marketing-Driven Titles


Especially from the 1970s–1990s karate/Kung Fu boom, schools used titles as branding.

Chief Grandmaster – Suggesting superiority over other grandmasters.

Founder/Headmaster – Even when the style was only loosely derived from karate/kung fu.

Doctor of Martial Arts / PhD in Martial Science – Often issued by diploma mills or martial arts federations that sold rank.


Reference: Krug, G. (2001). At the Feet of the Master: Three Stages in the Appropriation of Okinawan Karate into Anglo-American Culture.


5. Honorifics Popular in American Martial Arts Circles

Master Instructor – A high-rank title that sounds impressive, but usually not recognized by Japan/Okinawa/China.

Martial Arts Hall of Fame Inductee – Many U.S. organizations sell or grant this as an honorific, though not standardized.


Reference: Cynarski, W. (2015). Martial Arts Phenomenon: Research and Multidisciplinary Interpretation.


 Summary

Official U.S. titles = Instructor, Coach, Master, Grandmaster (regulated by federations).

Unofficial U.S. titles = Supreme Grandmaster, Soke, Shodai Soke, Professor (outside BJJ), Doctor of Martial Arts, Hall of Fame Master.

Many arose from student respect, American marketing culture, or misapplied Japanese/Chinese honorifics.


📚 References

Bowman, P. (2017). Martial Arts Studies: Disrupting Disciplinary Boundaries.

Bishop, M. (1999). Okinawan Karate.

Amdur, E. (2002). Old School: Essays on Japanese Martial Traditions.

Green, T., & Svinth, J. (2010). Martial Arts of the World: An Encyclopedia of History and Innovation.

Donohue, J. (1994). Warriors Dreams: The Martial Arts and the American Imagination.

Krug, G. (2001). At the Feet of the Master.

Cynarski, W. (2015). Martial Arts Phenomenon.


No comments: