Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne


I am not a leading authority on any one discipline that I write about and teach, it is my hope and wish that with all the subjects I have studied it provides me an advantage point that I offer in as clear and cohesive writings as possible in introducing the matters in my materials. I hope to serve as one who inspires direction in the practitioner so they can go on to discover greater teachers and professionals that will build on this fundamental foundation. Find the authorities and synthesize a wholehearted and holistic concept, perception and belief that will not drive your practices but rather inspire them to evolve, grow and prosper. My efforts are born of those who are more experienced and knowledgable than I. I hope you find that path! See the bibliography I provide for an initial list of experts, professionals and masters of the subjects.

Okinawan School Karate

Okinawa-ryū karate [沖縄流空手]

 - Alfonz Ingram & cejames


The integration of Okinawan karate into the formal education system of Okinawa began in the early 20th century as part of broader reforms to modernize Japan’s education system and promote physical fitness and character development. However, there were several significant changes to traditional karate as it became formalized for educational purposes. Here are the primary reasons for these changes:


1. Alignment with National Education Goals


Japan’s Meiji government, after the Meiji Restoration (1868), placed strong emphasis on physical education as part of the national curriculum to promote health and discipline, especially as the country was modernizing and expanding militarily. Okinawan karate was introduced into schools as a way to strengthen the physical health of students and build loyalty to the nation.

The goal was to foster strong, obedient citizens who could later serve in the military. As part of this agenda, karate was adapted to emphasize physical fitness, teamwork, and the cultivation of discipline and moral character (Shūshin).


2. Simplification and Standardization


Traditional Okinawan karate, practiced in small, private settings, involved complex training methods that included various katas (forms), deep exploration of bunkai (application), and weaponry training (kobudo). These elements were not considered suitable for mass instruction in a school setting, especially for children.

As a result, the practice was simplified to make it easier to teach large groups. Many of the more practical and deadly self-defense techniques, along with the deep philosophical aspects, were de-emphasized or removed. The focus was shifted toward the physical practice of basic techniques (kihon), such as punches, blocks, and kicks, and kata became the primary teaching tool.


3. Influence of Physical Education Theories


Karate’s integration into schools aligned with the rise of physical education theories from Western countries. German gymnastics and other Western-style physical training were influential in Japan’s educational reforms. Karate had to be adapted to fit this mold.

The introduction of training drills, group exercises, and standardized kata sequences was influenced by this need to fit karate into a physical education framework. As a result, karate was systematized and lost much of its original flexibility and individuality.


4. Incorporation into Japanese Cultural Identity


Okinawa was annexed by Japan in 1879, and the Japanese government sought to assimilate Okinawans into the broader Japanese identity. Karate, an indigenous Okinawan martial art, was seen as part of this local culture that needed to be aligned with Japanese values and practices.

With the inclusion of karate in the education system, it became “Japanized.” This meant removing certain aspects of Okinawan culture and adapting the practice to reflect broader Japanese values. One example was the change in terminology, such as the replacement of “Tode” (Okinawan for “Chinese hand”) with “Karate” (empty hand), which was a step toward making karate a Japanese art rather than a strictly Okinawan one.


5. Prominent Figures in the Change


Itosu Anko (1831–1915) is one of the key figures responsible for the modernization of karate for school settings. In 1901, Itosu introduced karate into the Shuri Jinjo Primary School and later advocated for its inclusion in the Okinawan school system and military training. He emphasized the practice of kata as a way to develop physical strength and mental discipline while minimizing the combat elements.

Itosu’s famous Ten Precepts of Karate (1908) was a letter to the Ministry of Education in which he outlined how karate could be beneficial for education and the physical and moral development of students. This document was instrumental in bringing karate into public schools, and it provided the rationale for standardizing and simplifying the art.


6. Development of Sport Karate


Over time, as karate continued to be part of the educational system, it took on a more competitive, sport-oriented nature. This was not part of the original Okinawan tradition, where karate was primarily a self-defense art. The educational reforms and the push to modernize and unify karate practices led to a more regulated, non-lethal form that could be practiced in a safe, controlled environment.

Karate tournaments and competitions emerged in the mid-20th century, further solidifying karate’s transformation into a sport, particularly in mainland Japan, as distinct from the original Okinawan karate, which retained a greater emphasis on self-defense and practical applications.


Conclusion


The incorporation of karate into the Okinawan education system involved significant changes that helped transform it from a traditional martial art focused on self-defense and spiritual development into a standardized practice suited for physical education and national identity. The changes, primarily driven by figures like Itosu Anko, were shaped by broader political and social forces aimed at modernizing Okinawa and integrating it into the Japanese state. While these adaptations made karate accessible to more people, they also led to the loss of certain traditional elements, particularly those related to its self-defense and philosophical roots.


References:


Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do: My Way of Life. Kodansha International, 1975.

Higaonna, Morio. The History of Karate: Okinawan Goju-Ryu. Dragon Times, 1995.

Bishop, Mark. Okinawan Karate: Teachers, Styles and Secret Techniques. Tuttle Publishing, 1999.


The incorporation of Okinawan karate into the Okinawan school system during the early 20th century brought about significant changes to the art. These changes were driven by the need to adapt traditional martial arts training into a standardized, systematized practice that could be taught within the context of physical education. Below are the key changes that were made:


1. Simplification of Techniques


Traditional Okinawan karate was a complex system of martial arts that included various aspects like striking, grappling, joint locks, and even weapons training (kobudo). For the educational context, many of these complex and potentially dangerous techniques were removed or simplified. The emphasis shifted to:


Kihon (basic techniques): These include punches, blocks, and kicks that could be easily taught to a large group of students.

Kata (forms): Kata became the central focus of school karate training. These pre-arranged sequences of movements were ideal for large groups, as they allowed students to practice basic movements in a controlled manner without sparring or full-contact training.


Itosu Anko, who was instrumental in the introduction of karate into the school system, developed simplified versions of kata to be taught in schools. For example, he created the Pinan (Heian) kata series, which were designed to be easier for beginners to learn than the more complex traditional forms.


Reference: Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do: My Way of Life, Kodansha International, 1975.


2. Removal of Dangerous Techniques


Okinawan karate included techniques intended for real-world self-defense, such as vital point strikes (kyusho-jutsu), joint manipulations, and throws. These techniques were deemed inappropriate for young students in a school setting, so they were largely removed from the curriculum. The focus was placed on non-lethal, non-injurious techniques that promoted physical fitness and discipline rather than combat readiness.


This shift moved karate away from its roots as a practical self-defense system and towards a more fitness-oriented, character-building activity.


Reference: Bishop, Mark. Okinawan Karate: Teachers, Styles and Secret Techniques, Tuttle Publishing, 1999.


3. Increased Emphasis on Physical Fitness


With karate becoming part of the national physical education curriculum, there was a significant shift in focus toward physical conditioning. The original self-defense-oriented training methods were replaced with exercises that promoted general fitness, strength, and flexibility. These changes aligned with Japan’s national policy of promoting physical health in the education system.


Exercises such as group calisthenics, running, and other forms of conditioning became an integral part of the karate training in schools. The goal was to develop strong, healthy, and disciplined students who could serve the nation, particularly in the military, rather than producing martial artists skilled in combat.


Reference: Higaonna, Morio. The History of Karate: Okinawan Goju-Ryu, Dragon Times, 1995.


4. Standardization of Curriculum


Before its incorporation into the education system, Okinawan karate was largely taught on an individual basis, with each instructor passing down unique methods to small groups of students. Once it was introduced into schools, the need for standardization became apparent.


The curriculum had to be unified so that it could be taught in a consistent manner across multiple schools.

The creation of standardized kata sequences (like the Pinan kata) made karate more accessible and uniform, ensuring that all students learned the same foundational skills.


The move toward standardization also facilitated the formal grading systems that began to emerge, allowing students to be assessed on their proficiency in specific, well-defined areas of karate.


Reference: Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do Kyohan: The Master Text, Kodansha International, 1973.


5. Decreased Emphasis on Self-Defense and Practical Application


Traditional Okinawan karate was a martial art with a strong focus on practical self-defense. This emphasis shifted significantly when karate entered the school system. Since the goal was not to prepare students for real combat but rather to build their physical fitness, discipline, and moral character, the focus on self-defense applications was minimized.


Bunkai, the practice of applying kata techniques to real combat scenarios, was largely downplayed in school karate.

Sparring (kumite) was either minimal or non-existent in the early stages of school karate. This removed the hands-on, combative aspect of the art, making it safer and more suitable for children and teenagers.


Reference: Bishop, Mark. Okinawan Karate: Teachers, Styles and Secret Techniques, Tuttle Publishing, 1999.


6. Shift in Purpose: From Martial Art to Character Development


Karate was traditionally taught as a method of self-defense and self-improvement, both physically and mentally. However, when it was introduced into the school system, its purpose shifted to a tool for character development, physical health, and moral education.


Itosu Anko’s Ten Precepts of Karate (1908) outlined how karate could be beneficial in fostering values such as discipline, respect, and perseverance among students.

Karate training was seen as a way to instill the virtues of loyalty, endurance, and a strong spirit, aligning with Japan’s nationalistic goals at the time.


This change in purpose led to a philosophical shift in karate, emphasizing the moral and ethical benefits of training over its combative aspects.


Reference: Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do: My Way of Life, Kodansha International, 1975.


7. Military Influence and the “Japanization” of Karate


As part of Japan’s push toward modernization and militarization in the early 20th century, karate was modified to serve the broader national interests of Japan. With Okinawa’s annexation by Japan in 1879, Okinawan karate began to be incorporated into the national identity and shaped by Japanese influences. Karate was seen as a way to promote physical fitness in young men who could potentially serve in the Japanese military.


The changes made to karate in schools reflected a broader “Japanization” process, with the term “karate” (meaning “empty hand”) becoming more widely accepted instead of the original term “Tode” (meaning “Chinese hand”).


This nationalistic push led to karate becoming less about individual expression and self-defense and more about fostering collective strength, obedience, and loyalty to the state.


Reference: Higaonna, Morio. The History of Karate: Okinawan Goju-Ryu, Dragon Times, 1995.


Conclusion


The integration of Okinawan karate into the school system fundamentally transformed the art. It became simplified, standardized, and focused on character development and physical fitness rather than practical self-defense. These changes were influenced by broader educational reforms, nationalistic goals, and the military needs of Japan at the time. While the integration helped popularize karate and make it accessible to a wider audience, it also led to a loss of many traditional elements that had once been central to Okinawan karate.


References:


Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do: My Way of Life. Kodansha International, 1975.

Funakoshi, Gichin. Karate-Do Kyohan: The Master Text. Kodansha International, 1973.

Higaonna, Morio. The History of Karate: Okinawan Goju-Ryu. Dragon Times, 1995.

Bishop, Mark. Okinawan Karate: Teachers, Styles and Secret Techniques. Tuttle Publishing, 1999.


No comments: