Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Multiple Methodologies

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

This is about self-defense. I say self-defense because fighting, except as applied in sports, is illegal and combatives, although a great sound bite to attract customers, is also illegal and used, from where I sit as an inactive Marine, as a means to apply hand-to-hand in combat when other means of combat are missing. 

Self-defense as currently taught in many dojo and SD courses is all about feeling good, feeling safe and building self-confidence and that means using a technique-based teaching and training model. It kinda goes like this, “If your attacker does this, you do this as a counter and then you do this to make sure the attacker is down, out and unable to continue the attack.” Sound familiar? Listen, I was trained a long time ago with this model along with combatives as a Marine in karate and martial arts. It was the way it was done and as the times passed it made a great syllabus that was easily taught, easily tested and easily assigned rankings all toward the commercialization model and for sports. 

In sports you can easily see the technique and based on perceptions, some from experience (in sports not real life attacks) and some from the perception of experience to say, “This one is too dangerous so it is forbidden, this one is safe so we can use it, etc.” 

In combatives as I see them it is almost exclusively about ROE or Rules of Engagement dictated by those rules of war that society and the civilian/military leadership enforce for a variety of reasons not always the best for combat. 

In self-defense society once again rules the roost and it is about perceptions and distinctions that are not always about true application of self-defense but rather a perception and distinction derived from those who have the least amount of experience, knowledge and understanding toward conflict and violence, real life conflict and violence not the media entertainment versions we all tend to assume is reality.

Now that the ground work is laid out we can hit the topic of this article, multiple methodologies, i.e., “Multiple Defense Methodologies [actual tactics and attack methodologies of impacts, drives (pushes), pulls, twists, takedowns/throws and compression are best for stopping a threat (types of force applied such as spiraling, scissoring, carving, vibrating, and/or sheering forces.)].”

If we remove all references to what specified technique or combination is for any one specified method of attack and focus on methodologies then we are not tied to specifics. In self-defense there is no way one person can know “All the Attacks Possible” in a technique based defense but there are only the above methodologies that are applied in ways that get the job done according to those methods used in an attack. 

One of the most amazing things about the human being is our brains and the vastness of its capabilities to change and modify things so that there are innumerable amount of unique ways they can apply any one or combination of methodologies to attack. Use the phone like keypad of a security process just to get into your phone. There are also almost innumerable combinations of those ten numbers on that keypad you can use to safeguard your data and that is why the FBI and Apple are in contention because getting past that keypad combination of numbers is almost impossible - almost. Now, the above list of methodologies, i.e., six of them as listed, are used if trained and practice properly to make innumerable techniques and combinations not tied to specific techniques to achieve a goal of either defense or attack. 

Think about that, learning to use and apply methodologies not tied to the restrictions of any one type of technique leaves you the ability to incorporate one or any along with an infinite amount of defensive actions to stop an attack, most times putting most attackers in a OO bounce or loop trying to catch up in lieu of you trying to find that appropriate single techniques that will work against his attack, think about that for a while.

Once you figure out how valuable multiple methodology models work then you add in two more models to make that tri-pod of integrated wholehearted karate and martial arts for self-defense, i.e., the fundamental principles and the types of forces applied through a principled based application of multiple defense methodologies. That is it, the full monty of karate and martial arts exposed (pun intended). It is worth thinking about. 

Now, here is the greatest aspect I see in all this, it is that the atomistic teachings of the techique based model is still a valuable teaching tool. A tool used in the first phase of karate and martial arts self-defense. The beginners model that gets you through to the point where you have a foundation of references that when you start teaching multiple methodologies and types of force you begin to take out the atomistic and put in the integrative whole of self-defense as described here. 

Everything else comes from the teaching of principles that are taught from day one. Principles are that very foundation that leads us to integrate the other aspects in the first phase so we don’t become mired down in a techniques based model. Granted, this model kind of makes it difficult to test and grade but you might find that for self-defense, if you need it and it is your goal, it is the best path to follow. 

Bibliography (Click the link)


No comments: