Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Technique Teaching of Self-Defense

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

When a person first encounters the self-defense world in this modern society it usually comes from the martial arts communities. When entering the dojo the very first, and almost always the only venue, self-defense training received is the model, “Technique teaching of self-defense.” What does this mean, it means that the instructor tries to assign specific techniques to specific attack techniques, techniques often learned, passed down and taught by persons who have no experience in actual self-defense. Even more often that technique teaching is created without the research into sources with experience. 

If your attacker does this then you do this . Here is the crux of it, it is not reality, real life or self-defense. 

Martial arts are taught most often as “Person-to-Person” fighting. Technique teaching is more about what the instructor thinks or perceives as a hands-on attack where all the other aspects to conflict and violence such as awareness and avoidance are simply not taught, ignored or forgotten completely (even if the instructor even is aware of self-defense).

Person-to-person fighting is mutual, often social violence oriented, and therefore “Illegal” and both parties will find that they may answer legally for their actions especially if it involves grave bodily harm or death (you get angry, you strike out, other guy falls and hits head, goes into coma and/or dies - ops). 

Technique over principles is a very narrow teaching model when it comes to combatives, fighting and especially self-defense. Remember, combatives and fighting are illegal and frowned upon in modern society. Self-defense is strictly and closely monitored and governed by societies laws, etc. creating a self-defense square that is very small and easily breached when in a self-defense situation (thanks to Mr. MacYoung for the square analogy).

Look at technique teaching models as the “Easy Way” to teach something that will more often than not get you deeply into the legal quagmire that will swallow you up like quicksand sucks you down till you head disappears leaving the surface clean and without any sign of your passing. 

The teachings of self-defense start on that road many, many miles before any such technique is taught. In SD most times it is not about any particular technique but a group of principle based actions that stop a threat. In modern martial arts that divide between technique and principle based teachings may be the most difficult concept to see, realize and accept. It is tantamount to the difference between basic math, i.e., 1 + 1 = 2, and (axiomatic) geometry where concepts and principles apply (or maybe calculus?). 


Bibliography (Click the link)

No comments: