Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Bunkai Must Be Changed


I believe it bunkai. I believe in kata. I don't believe the current state of both are conducive to self-defense without a great deal of change. I believe, for the Isshinryu system, the bunkai taught currently is not for self-defense. I also believe the so called the "Shimabuku Tatsuo no Kumite" drills for self-defense fail to meet enough criteria to teach self-defense or to be used for self-defense.

Granted, within those things there are things that can be adjusted for self-defense but that takes a very experienced and knowledgable person to bring out the self-defense capabilities of bunkai and kata. 

I have been studying the Isshinryu kata bunkai for a while now and I see one theme throughout all of it, the "dueling paradigm (Rory Miller, Martial Mistakes dtd Saturday, August 03, 2013)" These kata and their bunkai, while good tools to teach you various fundamental principles of martial systems, tends toward squaring off with an opponent. Does this occur in real life violent encounters? It does occur most often in sportive events where competitive rules govern the what, when, where, how and why of any violent action. Is this true to the street violence with no rules, etc.?

Some things that Mr. Miller wrote in his blog bring this thought to my mind such as asking yourself, "How can you know when such a small percentage of your class will ever use self-defense" and "Deadliness, you can't know unless you kill people." What about asking yourself, "Will the bunkai and kata I practice actually work in a truly violent attack?"

I feel a good marker to determine the validity of your system for self-defense is to ask yourself if that training and practice takes you way away from your comfort and certainty (Rory Miller, Community dtd Thursday, August 01, 2013). Reading both articles by Mr. Miller should give you a better idea of what I am trying to say, "Our bunkai and kata must be changed to reflect reality or we are just fooling ourselves and our students into thinking it will work in self-defense."

If we use visualization along with two person drills are we allowing for chaos, unpredictability and the seeking of outside that box of the monkey dance driven dueling sportive thing we all are glued to dogmatically to keep our comfort and certainty of self-defense perceptions as dictated in news and entertainment driven venues are we doing a proper service to ourselves and our students? 

Don't we owe it to ourselves to know and promote these types of distinctions? I wrote a comment to Mr. Miller for the artical "Martial Mistakes," that simply says, "Articles like this one to dispel the misconceptions regarding karate are important. Except, the ones who really need to read this are the ones who will fool themselves into NOT reading this."

No comments: