When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:
I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me
I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me
I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull
I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death
I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed
I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes
I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados
I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers
The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn
Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung
WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE
The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.
Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.
“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated.” - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)
“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)
“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne
弟子 - Deshi
門弟 - a pupil, a disciple
師弟 - master and pupil, teacher and student
子 - a child, a kid, a son, a daughter
子分 - a follower, a henchman, a following
弟子 - disciple (noun: disciple, pupil, apprentice, follower, adherent, young person, teacher's student-helper)
In one view a deshi is a "disciple" and it is believed in this system that a Sensei has many students or "seito" while only a very few "deshi." It is expected that the deshi train harder than a seito and therefore receives more attention and pressure from Sensei to excel at the system.
To my view the use of the term is first and foremost a personal decision by the dojo Sensei. I find that most use it in a traditional setting yet that begs the questions as to whether the Sensei has gone to the extra effort to find out what a traditional dojo is, was, or might be from the source, i.e. for most karate that would be Okinawa, and actually trained and practiced well enough to be accurate for accuracy is critical if one wants to promote the customs, courtesies, and intent of the Okinawan Karate pioneers.
I try to encompass the traditions of the Okinawan dojo as I understand it yet also accept that it is flawed where new information is sought daily to ensure that I am increasing my knowledge, understanding, and accuracy in my practice. Most provide enough effort for lip-service and sales.
学生 - student (gaku-sei).
Teacher and Student - Kyoshi-to-seito - 教師と生徒
Master and Pupil - Shitei - 師弟
Here again it comes down to who is using the characters, the environment/intent, and the placement, i.e. arrangement of the various characters. As can be readily seen in my examples, making the assumption that the two sources of translation are fairly accurate, when coupled they mean one thing and when separated mean something sometimes and sometimes not related.
For me, even in a traditional way, a student is a student - a practitioner is a practitioner - a disciple is a disciple - a teacher is a teacher and all regardless of what you use as to characters or reference when in the training hall. I tend to try and not relate to any term that might misdirect a perspective practitioner to misunderstand or misdirect their efforts toward the more understood, at the beginning, relation to a grade/high/college school type teaching environment vs. a more eclectic training and practice environment.