Please take a look at Articles on self-defense/conflict/violence for introductions to the references found in the bibliography page.

Please take a look at my bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Please take a look at my Notable Quotes

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


When you begin to feel like you are a tough guy, a warrior, a master of the martial arts or that you have lived a tough life, just take a moment and get some perspective with the following:


I've stopped knives that were coming to disembowel me

I've clawed for my gun while bullets ripped past me

I've dodged as someone tried to put an ax in my skull

I've fought screaming steel and left rubber on the road to avoid death

I've clawed broken glass out of my body after their opening attack failed

I've spit blood and body parts and broke strangle holds before gouging eyes

I've charged into fires, fought through blizzards and run from tornados

I've survived being hunted by gangs, killers and contract killers

The streets were my home, I hunted in the night and was hunted in turn


Please don't brag to me that you're a survivor because someone hit you. And don't tell me how 'tough' you are because of your training. As much as I've been through I know people who have survived much, much worse. - Marc MacYoung

WARNING, CAVEAT AND NOTE

The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.



“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources (this applies to this and other blogs by me as well; if you follow the idea's, advice or information you are on your own, don't come crying to me, it is all on you do do the work to make sure it works for you!)



“You should prepare yourself to dedicate at least five or six years to your training and practice to understand the philosophy and physiokinetics of martial arts and karate so that you can understand the true spirit of everything and dedicate your mind, body and spirit to the discipline of the art.” - cejames (note: you are on your own, make sure you get expert hands-on guidance in all things martial and self-defense)



“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Search This Blog

Self-Defense|Martial Art Statement of Necessity

Go to Rory Miller's blog, "Chiron," and read his post, "Good Question." Near the end of that blog he makes a statement that resonated with me, " ... not being there to see what you see ... He needs to show what to look for, not tell what to do."

The second part reminds me that mostly martial arts instructors tend to make statements, sound bites that sound good, such as, "show me what you can do on the dojo floor," where they prefer to "see" what you can do over time vs. talking of rank and belts and trophies, etc.

In this particular quote Mr. Miller is, I believe, referring to what instructors of "self-defense" should be focusing on vs. "teaching what to do when you encounter this or that particular attacks."

It resonates with me because it expresses the core of self-defense training and instruction, i.e. an instructor should be showing you, teaching you, what to "look for" and leave the actual teaching of "specific technique to specific attacks" alone.

Nothing about self-defense is cut and dry like this teaching of specifics vs specifics.

When you read his entire post it clarifies the intent. I just wanted to pull out this part and express my theory in how I might apply this if I taught self-defense to non-professionals.

1 comment:

Zacky Chan said...

I totally agree.

My first experience in martial arts was in Hawaiian Kenpo with a teacher who I would classify as a fighter who would borrow from any style that would give someone an advantage in a self-defense situation.

Very rarely, he would have us do a drill called "wolfing", where the students would stand in a line, and he would assume a personality and antagonize one person, who was expected to "handle" the situation. Then, students would act as the "wolf". This was done very rarely, because it really spooked a lot of the students, and there didn't seem to be clear answers of what to do. We assessed that we shouldn't let someone get in our space and we need get our hands up to create some kind of bridge. We assessed that we should be calm and know where the exits are. The trickiest part though, is that my teacher said that if there's going to be a fight, whoever gets the first strike is going to have a potentially defining advantage.

"So if someone's in our face we should just go for the knockout?" "We should look for an exit and run?" "We should stand strong and never resort to violence?" "What would a good practitioner of Hawaiian Kenpo do?" These were the questions we all had, and the sensei did his best to answer each question, but it always seemed to come down to each situation being different and requiring a different response. A potentially terrifying answer for an aspiring martial artist.

Good teachers should be able to show you what to look for, not tell you what to do.