I recently read a forum post that is for women where one comment, taken away from the context, gives me a discussion or post. The comment was on strength, mens vs. women's, in training. I began to wonder why and have this theory that maybe the training is geared toward development of strength. The woman stated that when she looked around she noticed the other women in the hall struggling. The epiphany for this person was the discovery that karate, martial arts, is not about strength yet it appears that the competitive atmosphere was unconsciously pushing the women to compete with the strength of the men.
Why is this? I suspect, my theory, that it speaks to the western culture of sport and competition. I also might step into the danger zone by saying it may be due to the movement where we speak of equality. I agree with equality but with the differences of the person's as an intricate part of that maxim. Don't go flaming me out because I am not being a sexiest.
Women and men are different yet should be viewed as equals. It is not a bad thing to provide training suited to the individual be they male, female, large, small, strong or not so strong. It comes down to training and practicing the traditional martial arts where strength is not paramount and of considerable focus. The focus should be teaching and practicing with the individuals strengths and weaknesses, a whole person concept where strength and how it is applied are governed by martial systems fundamental principles, not strength alone or as a dominant feature.
Men rely heavily on strength and women don't. Women, truthfully, have the advantage here and we can learn from them to attain true budo proficiency in applying all the martial principles. After all, most men quit when the age and strength diminishes thinking they don't have it anymore but those who do have it wholeheartedly can keep on going until late in their winter years.
I see it as an advantage for women to gear their training and practice toward utilizing the full spectrum that is the fundamental principles of the martial systems where strength is not an issue but the mind-body principles are applied.
It speaks to why some smaller and not so strong antagonists can and do defeat the protagonists in conflicts and/or sparring, etc. They learned to apply the principles of martial systems as a whole and let go of the ego driven desire and need to be "strong." Take it as a strength of a different type that does not rely exclusively on muscles, size and aggressive attitudes that males seem to naturally drift toward in life.
In closing, if this seems sexist it is not my intent but if you feel this post could improve to remove any misunderstandings let me know in the comments.
Focus on the fundamental principles in practice and training and forget gender; forget strength; forget not so strong; forget size; forget weight both large and small - focus grasshopper!
I agree - in theory (as I think it was my comment you were referencing). In a perfect world, the focus would "be teaching and practicing with the individuals strengths and weaknesses, a whole person concept where strength and how it is applied are governed by martial systems fundamental principles, not strength alone or as a dominant feature" but, sadly, it isn't always. And that's really a shame.
ReplyDeleteWhat I mean is martial artists as students can only learn from that which they are taught. If strength as the be all/end all is what is served up class after class, then it will be all you know. And when you begin to struggle with the strength part, you will probably feel a bit inadequate in a "why can't I do this?" kind of way. You'll think it's YOU.
There is lots of ego and toughness inherent to western martial arts. Think about how many black belt tests you've heard about that were hours (or even days!) long and more about surviving than demonstrating skill and proficiency. That's mostly testosterone-driven, straight bad-a$$ (pardon the language) stuff right there. The "art" part kind of gets lost in the shuffle without a conscious effort to keep it as the focus.
But everyone thinks they are teaching it as it should be taught.
Sigh...
Felicia: Outstanding comment, much appreciated!
ReplyDeleteWhilst I agree in part with the above comment I think the point re black belt gradings may be miss interpreted. I'm sure there are some driven by testosterone however many black belt test that run hours do so to test the students ability to perform their art under pressure as they would be tested in a real world encounter. Pressure testing of our arts are what allows us to develop confidence in our skills and abilities - being able to perform under stress is essential - and whilst we can't replicate true attack pressure the ability to perform whilst tired and stressed can partially replicate this. Also performance under fatigued conditions demonstrates technique as strength is taken out of the equation. Just my opinion of course.
ReplyDeleteHi, Glenn: I agree with some reservations. The pressures encountered in testing are false one's to rely on in a predatory attack or even a social/asocial one. I say this because in the back of the mind there is still the knowledge that one is not going to die here in a test. The mere fact that it is labeled a "test" promotes a deep seated knowledge that one is not going to die or suffer any of the long term results of a fight, attack or predatory assault.
ReplyDeleteOne of the reasons I applied my Sensei's method of running training sessions that are Shugyo oriented over the whole of the way of karate. It stresses and stretches the practitioner but the mind-set is applied that it is NOT combat, fighting or predatory assaults. Even those reality based methods still have to deal with safety and "rules."
The quote I like from the Jesse Stone stories is one where a young girls asks Jesse, "Do you box?" Jesse says "No, I fight." She says, "What is the difference?" and Jesse rightly says, "Rules."